Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾǰúµÎ ¼öÆò°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ ÇϾǰúµÎ Æǵ¶¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

THE HORIZONTAL ANGULATION OF THE MANDIBULAR CONDYLAR HEAD AND ITS EFFECT ON INTERPRETATION

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1995³â 25±Ç 1È£ p.127 ~ 132
ÃÖ¼øö, À̻Q,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖ¼øö (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
À̻Q (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ

Abstract

ÀúÀÚµéÀº °ÇÁ¶ÇϾǰñÀÇ ÇϾǰúµÎ¸¦ Àý´ÜÇÏ¿© ¼öÆò°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ 0¡Æ¿¡¼­ 40¡Æ±îÁö Á¶ÀýÇÒ ¼ö
ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ 8ºÎÀ§¿¡´Â °ñÆíÀ» ºÎÂø½ÃÅ°°í 4ºÎÀ§¿¡´Â ±¸¸ÛÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ¿© ¸Å
°æ¿ì¿¡ Æijë¶ó¸¶¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀ» ÃÔ¿µÇÑ ÈÄ ¾ò¾îÁø »óÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. °ñÆíÀÌ ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ »ó³»¹æ, ÀüÁß¾Ó, Àü¿Ü¹æ¿¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§ °¡Àå Àß °üÂûµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î
°ñÆíÀÌ ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ »óÁß¾Ó¿¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§ Àß °üÂûµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª °ñÆíÀÌ ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ Ãֿܹæ, »ó¿Ü¹æ,
Àü³»¹æ, ÃÖ³»¹æ¿¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§´Â Àß °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
2. ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ¼öÆò°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï °ñÆíÀÇ °üÂûÀÌ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ¿´À¸³ª Åë°èÀûÀÎ À¯ÀǼºÀº
¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç ´Ù¸¸ ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ¼öÆò°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ 0¡ÆÀÎ °æ¿ì¿Í 40¡ÆÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡¸¸ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ
Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(P<0.05).
3. °ñÆı« ºÎÀ§´Â ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ÀüÁß¾Ó°ú »óÁß¾Ó¿¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§ °¡Àå Àß °üÂûµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ÃÖ¿ÜÃø°ú
ÃÖ³»Ãø¿¡ ÀÖÀ» ¶§ Àß °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ¼öÆò°æ»ç°¢¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù
(P>0.05).
#ÃÊ·Ï#
A number of panoramic radiographic images of the condylar head taken at various
horizontal angulations were compared. A small artificial osteophyte was attached to the
eight different portions of the condylar head and a small hole was created in four
different portions of the condylar head. Three oral and maxillofacial radiologists
evaluated the panoramic condylar images.
The results were as follows :
1. Osteophytes in the superomedial, anterocentral and anterolateral portions could be
detected easily, but those in the lateral, superolateral and medial portions were very hard
to identify.
2. The greater the condylar horizontal angle, the easier it was to detect an osteophyte.
But there was no statistically significant difference except between 0 and 40 degrees of
horizontal angulation.
3. Holes in the anterocentral and superocentral portions could be detected easily, but
those in the lateral and medial portions were very hard to identify. There were no
differences between the various condylar horizontal angles.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸